OCC
OCC AA-ENF-2025-54 — Order of Prohibition
Summary
The OCC issued a permanent order of prohibition against former bank employee Dyemond Williams for engaging in unauthorized customer account withdrawals. The order permanently bars Williams from participating in the affairs of any insured depository institution or financial regulatory agency.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY
In the Matter of: Dyemond Williams Former Associate JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. Columbus, OH
AA-ENF-2025-54
CONSENT ORDER
WHEREAS, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) intends to initiate prohibition proceedings against Dyemond Williams (“Respondent”) pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1818(e) on the basis of Respondent’s activities while serving as an Associate of JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Bank”);
WHEREAS, in the interest of cooperation and to avoid the costs associated with future administrative and judicial proceedings with respect to the above matter, Respondent, without admitting or denying any wrongdoing, desires to consent to the issuance of this Consent Order (“Order”) issued pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1818(e).
NOW, THEREFORE, it is stipulated by and between the OCC, through the duly authorized representative of the Comptroller of the Currency (“Comptroller”), and Respondent that:
ARTICLE I
JURISDICTION
(1) The Bank is an “insured depository institution” as that term is defined in 12 U.S.C. § 1813(c)(2).
(2) Respondent was an employee of the Bank and is an “institution-affiliated party” of the Bank as that term is defined in 12 U.S.C. § 1813(u), having served in such capacity within six (6) years from the date of this Order. See 12 U.S.C. § 1818(i)(3).
(3) The Bank is a national banking association within the meaning of 12 U.S.C. § 1813(q)(1)(A), and is chartered and examined by the OCC. See 12 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.
(4) The OCC is the “appropriate Federal banking agency” as that term is defined in 12 U.S.C. § 1813(q) and is therefore authorized to initiate and maintain this prohibition action against Respondent pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1818(e).
ARTICLE II
COMPTROLLER’S FINDINGS
The Comptroller finds, and Respondent neither admits nor denies, the following:
(1) Between at least August 7, 2019 and May 23, 2022, Respondent was an Associate at the Bank.
(2) From approximately April 16, 2022 to April 25, 2022, Respondent made unauthorized withdrawals and/or assisted others in making unauthorized withdrawals from customer accounts. The Bank suffered a loss of at least $38,500.
(3) By reason of the foregoing conduct, Respondent engaged in a violation of law or regulation. Respondent’s misconduct resulted in loss or risk of loss to the Bank. Respondent demonstrated personal dishonesty.
ARTICLE III
ORDER OF PROHIBITION
Respondent consents to, and it is ORDERED that:
(1) With respect to the institutions and agencies set forth in paragraph (2) of this Article, Respondent hereby agrees that shall not:
(a) participate in any manner in the conduct of their affairs; (b) solicit, procure, transfer, attempt to transfer, vote, or attempt to vote any proxy, consent, or authorization with respect to any voting rights; (c) violate any voting agreement previously approved by the “appropriate Federal banking agency,” as defined in 12 U.S.C. § 1813(q); or (d) vote for a director, or serve or act as an “institution-affiliated party,” as defined in 12 U.S.C. § 1813(u).
(2) The prohibitions in paragraph (1) of this Article apply to the following institutions and agencies:
(a) any insured depository institution, as defined in 12 U.S.C. § 1813(c); (b) any institution treated as an insured bank under 12 U.S.C. § 1818(b)(3), (b)(4) or (b)(5); (c) any insured credit union under the Federal Credit Union Act; (d) any institution chartered under the Farm Credit Act of 1971; (e) any appropriate Federal depository institution regulatory agency; and (f) the Federal Housing Finance Agency and any Federal Home Loan Bank.
(3) The prohibitions of paragraphs (1) and (2) of this Article shall cease to apply with respect to a particular institution if Respondent obtains the prior written consent of both the OCC and the institution’s “appropriate Federal financial institutions regulatory agency,” as defined in 12 U.S.C. § 1818(e)(7)(D).
This Order shall be enforceable to the same extent and in the same manner as an effective and outstanding order that has been issued and has become final pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1818.
ARTICLE VIII
CLOSING
(1) By executing this Order, Respondent waives:
(a) the right to a Notice of Intention to Prohibit Further Participation under 12 U.S.C. § 1818(e). (b) all rights to a hearing and a final agency decision pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1818(e) and 12 C.F.R. Part 19; (c) all rights to seek judicial review of this Order; (d) all rights in any way to contest the validity of this Order; and (e) any and all claims for fees, costs, or expenses against the United States, the OCC, or any officer, employee, or agent of the OCC, related in any way to this enforcement matter or this Order, whether arising under common law or under the terms of any statute, including, but not limited to, the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. § 504 and 28 U.S.C. § 2412.
(2) Respondent shall not cause, participate in, or authorize the Bank (or any subsidiary or affiliate of the Bank) to incur, directly or indirectly, any expense relative to the negotiation and issuance of this Order except as permitted by 12 C.F.R. § 7.2014 and Part 359. In addition, Respondent shall not, directly or indirectly, obtain or accept any indemnification (or other reimbursement) from the Bank (or any subsidiary or affiliate of the Bank) with respect to such amounts except as permitted by 12 C.F.R. § 7.2014 and Part 359.
(3) Respondent acknowledges that she has read and understands the premises and obligations of this Order and declares that no separate promise or inducement of any kind has been made by the OCC or any officer, employee, or agent of the OCC to cause or induce Respondent to agree to consent to the issuance of this Order and/or to execute this Order.
(4) This Order constitutes a settlement of any proceedings arising out of the facts, omissions, or violations described in the Comptroller’s Findings (Article II of this Order). The OCC agrees not to institute the proceedings referenced in the first whereas clause of this Order for the specific acts, omissions, or violations described in Article II of this Order unless such acts, omissions, or violations reoccur. However, the specific acts, omissions, or violations described in Article II may be used by the OCC in future enforcement actions to establish a pattern of misconduct or the continuation of a pattern of misconduct.
(5) This Order shall not be construed as an adjudication on the merits and, except as set forth in paragraph (4) above, shall not inhibit, estop, bar, or otherwise prevent the OCC from taking any action affecting Respondent if, at any time, the OCC deems it appropriate to do so to fulfill the responsibilities placed upon the OCC by the several laws of the United States.
(6) Nothing in this Order shall preclude any proceedings brought by the OCC to enforce the terms of this Order, and nothing in this Order constitutes, nor shall Respondent contend that it constitutes, a waiver of any right, power, or authority of any other representatives of the United States or agencies thereof, including the Department of Justice, to bring other actions deemed appropriate.
(7) This Order is intended to be, and shall be construed to be, a final order issued pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1818, and expressly does not form, and may not be construed to form, a contract binding on the United States, the OCC, or any officer, employee, or agent of the OCC. Respondent expressly acknowledges that no officer, employee, or agent of the OCC has statutory or other authority to bind the United States, the United States Treasury Department, the OCC, or any other federal bank regulatory agency or entity, or any officer, employee, or agent of those entities, to a contract affecting the OCC’s exercise of its supervisory responsibilities.
(8) This Order is “issued with the consent of . . . the institution-affiliated party concerned,” pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1818(h)(2).
(9) The terms of this Order, including this paragraph, are not subject to amendment or modification by any extraneous expression, prior agreements, or prior arrangements between the parties, whether oral or written.
(10) The provisions of this Order are effective upon issuance by the OCC, through the Comptroller’s duly authorized representative, whose hand appears below, and shall remain effective and enforceable, except to the extent that, and until such time as, any provisions of this Order shall have been amended, suspended, waived, or terminated in writing by the OCC, through the Comptroller’s duly authorized representative.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set her hand.
/s/ 3/10/26 Dyemond Williams Date
IT IS SO ORDERED.
//s// Digitally Signed, Dated: 2026.04.01 Greg J. Coleman
Source: https://www.occ.gov/static/enforcement-actions/eaAA-ENF-2025-54.pdf
Common questions
- What does "OCC AA-ENF-2025-54 — Order of Prohibition" cover?
- The OCC issued a permanent order of prohibition against former bank employee Dyemond Williams for engaging in unauthorized customer account withdrawals.…
- Which agency issued this update?
- This update was issued by OCC.
Related updates
- Pionex, Inc. Consent Order issued by the Division of Banking
- OCC AA-ENF-2026-15 — Order of Prohibition
- Sigue Corporation Interim Consent Order issued by the Division of Banking
- Consent Order Block Inc.
- Notice of Possession
- Ultralight FS,. Inc., formerly known as Obopay, Inc., also doing business as Obopay USA